We watched Natasha, Pierre and the Great Comet of 1812 in January 2024 when it was first mounted at Crow’s Guloein Theatre. That show was breathtaking with some of the best staging and use of intimate space that we had ever encountered. Configured as a thrust stage with the audience on 3 sides sitting in about 8 rows of stadium seating, as well as a few cabaret-style floor seats with tables on the sides, everyone was relatively close to the action. Actors weaved across the floor and up and down the aisles, occasionally interacting with audience members. I wrote extensively about this musical the first time that I saw it. You can read about that here: https://torontohappenings.blogspot.com/2024/01/theatre-2024-natasha-pierre-and-great.html
I will not describe it in depth again but will merely point out the differences in experience for the remounting of the show by Mirvish Productions as part of their 2024/25 Subscription Series. Since just about the entire cast from the Crow's production has returned to reprise their roles, the difference will mainly be staging and choreography in the new space.
When it was announced that the show would play at the much larger and less configurable Royal Alexandra Theatre, I felt some skepticism that we would have the same immersive and exciting experience. The original show was just about perfect, with the one exception of the appearance of the “great” comet which came across as a bit of a dud. I was interested to see how the set design for this new space would compare to the magic achieved from the staging of the first production and whether we would get a more impressive comet, closer to the experience on Broadway.Two rows consisting of around 15 seats were placed on either side of the Royal Alex stage to simulate the immersive staging from the Crow’s production and to give the actors access to audience members for the “audience participation” moments built into the show. These seats must have been popular since they were all snapped up very quickly after being put on sale. While this might give the seat-holders a unique, up-close experience, these are not the best seats for viewing and appreciating the show since you mostly get to see the sides and backs of the actors. Meanwhile most of the over 1200 stadium seats that face the stage (including two levels of balcony) are too far away to feel part of the action like we did at Crow’s Theatre. Even though our seats at the front of the Dress Circle offered us a great view, we were not close enough replicate the immersive environment from our first viewing of the show. Yet, the 1907 Royal Alexandra Theatre, designed in Beaux-Arts architecture, provides a fitting backdrop for this show in terms of elegance and lavish décor. Its crystal chandeliers, elaborately carved railings, gilded plasterwork, ruby red chairs and red velour wallpaper perfectly complement the set design for Natasha, which features red velvet draped walls and cantilevered balconies and boxes leading to steep staircases on either side of the stage. From that perspective, it felt like the staging was an extension of the theatre.Whether it was the larger space and being farther away, or the loss of the anticipation and suspense that was present when I watched the musical for the first time, this new staging did not have the same wow factor for me. The larger stage changed the choreography and movement of the actors and in my opinion, not for the better. At Crow’s Theatre, during a big party scene, all the actors crowded together onto a tiny platform and then several men proceeded to do a version of the Russian squat dance while lined up in a row. I remember being amazed that they did not fall off or kick one another. This was missing in the same scene at the Royal Alex and the actors were much more spread out. Another highlight for me in the original production was the advance of Balaga the Trokia Driver as he and Anatole approached on his sleigh to carry Natasha away. The choreography in the Royal Alex production seemed less exciting and felt a bit flat in comparison.
Finally, we come to the Great Comet, which was the only part of the staging at Crow’s Theatre that I was disappointed in. I found that comet to be more “Underwhelming” than “Great”. At Royal Alex, the staging was better. The round mirror at the back of the stage was transformed into the comet which glowed a bit as stage lights aimed at it to produce streaks. Beneath this, a row of lights shone, perhaps to represent the path of the comet. This would have been more effective had this row of lights not shone in other scenes and if a brighter light could have emanated from the orb. But at least we now had a “Good” comet. We had a direct view of this stagecraft since our dress circle seats put us at eye level with the mirror. In retrospect, perhaps that mirror shone a little bit at Crow’s as well but since we were sitting closer to ground level, we did not notice so it couldn’t have been that bright.Although I could not recapture the same magic that I felt the first time that I watched it, this is still a wonderful original musical with luscious sets, great singing and dancing and interesting staging. I’m sure those who watch this version for the first time would love it as much as I did on my first viewing.